Draft Wills, Digital Files, and When Validation Can’t Help
Kirtus Evoy
February 3, 2026
Ontario’s Will validation rules are meant to prevent unfair outcomes where a person clearly intended a document to be their final Will, but the signing formalities weren’t perfect. However, there are limits — especially when the only “Will” is a digital, unsigned draft.
A recent Ontario case, Madhani v. Fast, 2025 ONSC 4100, is a reminder that an unsigned electronic will draft generally cannot be validated under Ontario law.
The common scenario:
- lawyer takes instructions to draft a Will for a client
- lawyer prepares draft Will
- a signing appointment is booked
- the client dies before the Will is signed
In Madhani, the draft Will was never printed and never executed. The draft existed only as an electronic file.
Can the Court “validate” the draft anyway?
Ontario’s validating provision is found at Section 21.1 of the Succession Law Reform Act (“SLRA”). Section 21.1 allows the Court to validate a document that does not comply with execution formalities provided it reflects the deceased’s testamentary intentions. In Madhani, the Court held Section 21.1 cannot be used to validate a Will that exists only in electronic form.
Why not?
Another piece of Ontario legislation, the Electronic Commerce Act, 2000 (“ECA”) explicitly limits the Court’s validating power. Section 31 of the ECA excludes Wills from electronic recognition. Section 21.1(2) of the SLRA explicitly makes Will validation subject to the Section 31 ECA exclusion. In short: Ontario law still requires a physical testamentary document for validation to even be possible.
Testamentary intention still matters
Nevermind the “electronic draft” problem, which is significant on its own. There must also be evidence before the Court that supports the digital draft was a valid reflection of the deceased Client’s fixed and final intention. Did the Client read the final draft? Did the Client sign the final draft? What evidence can be produced?
Ontario courts often use the “deliberate, fixed and final intention” test drawn from George v. Daily, 1997 CanLII 17825 (MB CA). In Madhani, the draft Will was to be reviewed and confirmed at the signing meeting — only the signing meeting never happened – which means there was no evidence whether the draft Will reflected the deceased Client’s fixed and final intention. The Court was not quite reasonably unsatisfied.
How this differs from other validation cases
Ontario courts have validated wills with execution defects where the document was physical and clearly authentic, for example:
- Cruz v. Public Guardian and Trustee, 2023 ONSC 3629
- Vojska v. Ostrowski, 2023 ONSC 3894
But those cases involved paper documents that were physically present and clearly connected to the deceased’s final intentions.
Practical takeaways
This case is a caution for both lawyers and families:
- Print important drafts (especially when a signing meeting is imminent)
- try to obtain direct confirmation from the client (not only through intermediaries)
- digital drafts on devices may not be legally usable as Wills in Ontario
Bottom line
Madhani confirms that Ontario’s Will-validation in Section 21.1 SLRA is helpful — but it is not a workaround for electronic-only drafts. Until legislation changes, a Will still needs to exist in physical form before Ontario’s courts can even consider validating it under SLRA s. 21.1.


